Genelec Community Forum has been archived

Thank you for all the years of Community discussions and activity!

The time has come for us to retire the community forums, but we will keep everything available for reading. There is a lot of valuable content written over the years, and you'll be able to access all of that. However, no new posts can be written, or old posts modified.

If you have questions, we recommend you use the Support function on the bottom right corner to contact our Customer Support directly.

Alternatively, if you wish to engage in a community discussion with other people, there are many active forums available. There is also an active, fan managed GENELEC COMMUNITY in Facebook, and many Genelec employees are active in the discussions there.

We are sorry for any possible inconvenience this may cause you, but we hope to hear from you through the other channels mentioned above.

Genelec Support


GLM vs IP network

petri.kotiranta, muokattu 2 Vuodet sitten.

GLM vs IP network

Youngling Viestejä: 3 Liittymispäivä: 17.5.2020 Viimeisimmät viestit

Would be interesting to know the reason for having own proprietary protocol for speaker configuration. Connecting speakers to IP network would be more practical. Are there plans to include IP connectivity in future models?

earmark, muokattu 2 Vuodet sitten.

RE: GLM vs IP network

Youngling Viestejä: 2 Liittymispäivä: 28.4.2017 Viimeisimmät viestit

Considering that Genelec is struggling to release a macOS 10.15 compatible GLM I doubt that they have the 'necessities' to accomplish this. While Genelec are now offering a couple of their smaller 'installation' models with IP connectivity, it's Ravenna based which somewhat limits the scope even with AES67 compatibility. For better or worse Audinate are crushing it in terms of getting their protocol into products. If Genelec offered Dante across their product line I would replace all of my Genelcs (8361A, 8260A, 8330A, 8320A)with those updated models in a heartbeat.