Genelec Community Forum has been archived

Thank you for all the years of Community discussions and activity!

The time has come for us to retire the community forums, but we will keep everything available for reading. There is a lot of valuable content written over the years, and you'll be able to access all of that. However, no new posts can be written, or old posts modified.

If you have questions, we recommend you use the Support function on the bottom right corner to contact our Customer Support directly.

Alternatively, if you wish to engage in a community discussion with other people, there are many active forums available. There is also an active, fan managed GENELEC COMMUNITY in Facebook, and many Genelec employees are active in the discussions there.

We are sorry for any possible inconvenience this may cause you, but we hope to hear from you through the other channels mentioned above.

Genelec Support

Keskusteluryhmät

8250 vs. 8351

jonih, muokattu 7 Vuodet sitten.

8250 vs. 8351

Youngling Viestejä: 1 Liittymispäivä: 19.3.2014 Viimeisimmät viestit
Hello!

I currently have a pair of 8250s with the GLM software. I was thinking that do you think I would benefit from upgrading to the new 8351? I listen at a very close distance and I understood that the new model is very good at that kind of setting.
digipete, muokattu 7 Vuodet sitten.

Re: 8250 vs. 8351

Padawan Viestejä: 99 Liittymispäivä: 18.6.2011 Viimeisimmät viestit
I would definitely try out the 8351 if it's within your financial range.

I preferred the 8260 specifically for two reasons:

- The Coaxial Midrange/Tweeter that images like nothing else
- Full rage monitor

Now the 8351 sports the same Coaxial Midrange/Tweeter as the 8260, and offers what probably will be full rage in any reasonable sized room.

Let us know if you decide to take it for a spin !!!